You are reading into these passages any denial of the special authority which He gave to Peter alone. There is nothing in the text which could be interpreted to mean that Jesus Christ did not intend for Peter to have authority over the Church during his earthly life. Again, this is in heaven, but not upon earth. When St. Peter went to heaven, he passed the keys to his successor. In the end, all authority will be returned to Jesus and Jesus will return everything to the Father. But, in the meantime, we do what Jesus has appointed us to do. And Jesus appointed those who succeed St.
- Master of the Highlands (A Highlands Novel);
- Black Intimacies: A Gender Perspective on Families and Relationships (Gender Lens).
- The Bohemian Pirate.
- Catholics and the Bible.
Peter in the office of Pope, to be Chief Shepherd's over His flock. The role of Peter in the early ecclesia is one of prominence but not of monopoly: That is the Catholic Doctrine. He is first among equals. On the contrary, when he says that a Bishoprick must be filled, he speaks of all of them.
And when he says that he has made provision for the Church, he means that he has already selected his successor. You are reading it through Protestant glasses. He is informing the Church, in a veiled statement, that he has already selected his successor. The reason it is veiled is because the Church is being persecuted by Jews and Romans.
Therefore, he doesn't reveal his whereabouts nor the identity of his successor in writing. Nor does he have to be. But Acts 5 highlights the authority over life and death which God has given the Shepherd of His flock. He doesn't say to live by faith alone, nor to turn to Scripture alone, and he definitely is preaching against any semblance of assurance of salvation.
And, more importantly, it is Jesus Christ who has already told St.
Peter who shall strengthen the Brethren in times of turmoil Luke Part 2 You Roman Catholics will frequently use the expression, "One fold and one shepherd" to defend the doctrine of the papacy. You guys teach that the "one shepherd" is the Pope and the "one fold" represents the Catholic Church.
On the contrary, Jesus said that HE was the good shepherd: "I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for his sheep I am the good shepherd, and I know mine and mine know me, even as the Father knows me and I know the Father; and I lay down my life for my sheep. And other sheep I have that are not of this fold. Them also I must bring and they shall hear my voice, and there shall be one fold and one shepherd. Jesus is that one good shepherd. If one is subject to Christ as the one shepherd--that's one. If one is subject to the Pope as the one Shepherd, there would be two.
The Scriptures only record one true shepherd. In the Bible,the church is often compared to the human body. The members of the church are represented as the various parts of the body. Christ is always said to be the head. See 1 Cor. My question is: "What part of the body is the Pope?
AnonymousDecember 29, at PM Part 2 You Roman Catholics will frequently use the expression, "One fold and one shepherd" to defend the doctrine of the papacy. I am the good shepherd, But the Good Shepherd, Himself, appointed another Shepherd that wouild oversee His flock after He went up to sit at the right hand of the Father. Also, I am asking, "How does one get the idea of a sub-head into the body? He reinforced this with the symbolism of the keys. And then again, with the symbolism of the Shepherd feeding His flock.
Therefore, we call the Pope, the visible head of the Church who represents Christ for us. Matthew Part 3 1. The rock on which the Church is founded is not Peter, but Peter's confession, "thou art the Christ". Paul explicitly states, "For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ".
To take Peter as the foundation flatly contradicts this passage. But in Matt. The power of the keys 5 given to Peter Matt. The keys were used by Peter in preaching to the Jews on the day of Pentecost Acts 2 ; to the household of Cornelius Acts cf. Acts 10 ; and to the Gentiles Acts Here Peter's condemnation uttered on earth was immediately enforced in heaven. Acts Peter said, "Jesus Christ maketh thee whole" verse 34; Jesus in heaven "loosed" the paralytic.
See also Acts Christ's Ecclesia will prevail against "hades" - 1 Cor. Peter did not receive infallible authority from Jesus, even in matters ex cathedra, for Paul wrote: "But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed.
The Church and the Papacy
Note how Christ also reproved Peter in Matt. There is not a particle of historical evidence that Peter passed on any authority to anyone; and, what is more important, there is no New Testament evidence at all that Christ commanded Peter to pass any authority. That doesn't help you any. Because it is St.
- Halfway House;
- Did the Catholic Church Give Us the Bible?: The True History of God's Words.
- The Gifted: A New Edition of Terri Blackstocks Classic Tale.
- Jolos Two Bedrooms.
- Did the Roman Catholic church give us our Bible?.
Peter who made the confession. And Jesus did not say, "your confession is rock solid". He said, "you are Peter". And Peter means Rock. Other people made the same confession. The following is the evidence: 1. On the contrary, you are simply misusing metaphors. Jesus Christ applied the metaphor of Rock to Simon in order to indicate that He would have authority over the Church. Jesus later applied the stone metaphor to Himself to indicate that He is God, the Rock of salvation.chromzarmiless.ga
DID THE CATHOLIC CHURCH REALLY GIVE US THE BIBLE?
There's no rule which says that metaphors must all mean the same thing. They are simply the masculine and feminine gender of the word. Petros had to be applied to Peter because Peter is a man. To use the word Petra would be a gauche use of grammar. It would be like calling you, "Jessica". Peter, that signifies that in order to lock and unlock, they need to do it in union with the Vicar of Christ to whom the keys were given. I'm not sure what point you think you're making with these verses.
None of them deny that St. Peter was given the keys or that the keys are those which represent the authority to bind and loose in heaven and upon earth. Peter was not speaking ex-Cathedra in that example. That verse served to highlight that St.
Paul was the one who needed perfection. Since he was admonishing St. Peter for something which he admitted to doing himself. Along the same vein, he admonished St. Peter for something which he recommended to everyone else: 1 Corinthians Authorized King James Version AKJV 9 But take heed lest by any means this liberty of yours become a stumblingblock to them that are weak. There is not a particle of historical evidence that Peter passed on any authority to anyone; and, what is more important, St.
Peter was still alive when the New Testament books were written. Jesus instituted an ongoing concern. The Church was to last until the end of time.
Did The Catholic Church Give Us The Bible?
And so it has: Matthew Authorized King James Version AKJV 19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: 20 teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Part 4 Answers to possible objections: Some Roman Catholics may argue that the difference in Greek words is only for stylistic variation. But the burden of proof does not rest on the interpreter who says that two different words have at least connotative distinctions of meaning; it rests on the one who argues that the difference is of no consequence and that style explains all.
Some argue that the use of two words in the Greek is of no consequence, for the original dialogue between Jesus and Peter took place in Aramaic, and undoubtedly but a single word Kepha, "Cephas" was used in the Aramaic conversation. The fallacy in this argument as in virtually all arguments based on proto-Aramaic New Testament conversations is that it involves a reasoning from the unknown to the known rather than from the known to the unknown.
Related Did The Catholic Church Give Us The Bible?
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved